<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology Failure [.com!] &#187; Public Transportation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologyfailure.com/category/public-transportation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technologyfailure.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:28:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Computer outage delays United flights at O&#8217;Hare</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/07/02/computer-outage-delays-united-flights-at-ohare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/07/02/computer-outage-delays-united-flights-at-ohare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Hare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Airlines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyfailure.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An outage of United&#8217;s check-in system caused delays at Chicago&#8217;s O&#8217;Hare earlier today, as reported by Chicago Breaking News:

FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory said that United had ordered a ground stop of its planes on its own that ended at 7:55 a.m. The problem began about 5:15 a.m., she said.
United had told the FAA that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An outage of United&#8217;s check-in system caused delays at Chicago&#8217;s O&#8217;Hare earlier today, as reported by <a href="http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/07/computer-glitch-causes-long-lines-at-ohare.html">Chicago Breaking News</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory said that United had ordered a ground stop of its planes on its own that ended at 7:55 a.m. The problem began about 5:15 a.m., she said.</p>
<p>United had told the FAA that it was a computer issue that made the airline unable to check in people for flights and resulted in an inability to get final flight information to the cockpit, Cory said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I only remember in my 10 years one other time&#8221; that computer glitches have caused this much trouble with flights, Cory said.</p>
<p>By about 9 a.m., an airline spokeswoman said that it was manually checking in travelers through mobile units and laptop computers to facilitate check-in for as many customers as possible, Szadokierski said. To get around the computer glitch, agents at the check-counters also called agents at other airport to have them check in travelers, with O&#8217;Hare agents then writing out boarding passes, she said.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The problems have since been addressed, but it took several hours and caused significant delays and some cancellations for travelers shortly before the beginning of 4th of July weekend. Larger-scale flight delays at major airports tend to have ripple effects, as schedules at many other connecting airports become affected.</p>
<p>This is also really expensive. In 2007 alone, flight delays were estimated to have cost the economy <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/delays/2008-05-22-travel-delays-billions_N.htm">more than $40B</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/07/02/computer-outage-delays-united-flights-at-ohare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baggage system error delays thousands at London&#8217;s Heathrow</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/30/baggage-system-error-delays-thousands-at-londons-heathrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/30/baggage-system-error-delays-thousands-at-londons-heathrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heathrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyfailure.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Problems with the baggage system at Heathrow&#8217;s Terminal 5 prevented numerous people from checking in for their British Airways flights on July 28.

Hundreds of British Airways passengers were left stranded at Heathrow Terminal 5 last night after the baggage system collapsed again.
Thousands more furious travellers faced severe delays and &#8211; amid chaotic scenes &#8211; many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problems with the baggage system at Heathrow&#8217;s Terminal 5 prevented numerous people from checking in for their British Airways flights on July 28.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Hundreds of British Airways passengers were left stranded at Heathrow Terminal 5 last night after the baggage system collapsed again.</p>
<p>Thousands more furious travellers faced severe delays and &#8211; amid chaotic scenes &#8211; many had to travel with only hand luggage.
</p></blockquote>
<p>(<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196111/Here-Hundreds-stranded-T5-gremlins-strike-again.html">Daily Mail</a>)</p>
<p>This affected an <a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/06/29/Check-in-glitch-strands-5000-at-Heathrow/UPI-73701246291074/">estimated 5000</a> travelers and caused both delays and expenses for many. It is also not the first time that significant baggage handling problems disrupted operations at Terminal 5. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/">Gizmodo</a>&#8217;s <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379123/why-heathrow-airport-terminal-5s-high-tech-failings">Why: Heathrow Airport Terminal 5&#8217;s High Tech Failings</a> discusses the problems that arose, just as the Terminal was opened early last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/30/baggage-system-error-delays-thousands-at-londons-heathrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brisbane airport shut down due to radar failure</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/26/brisbane-airport-shut-down-due-to-radar-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/26/brisbane-airport-shut-down-due-to-radar-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brisbane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyfailure.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Air traffic at Brisbane Airport was disrupted for a duration of about 40 minutes earlier today:

A data processing unit fault at Brisbane Airport had triggered an alert, with all flights in and out of Brisbane halted as a result.
Incoming flights from places such as Fiji and Coffs Harbour were diverted to Coolangatta Airport or put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Air traffic at Brisbane Airport was disrupted for a duration of about 40 minutes earlier <a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/radar-failure-shuts-down-brisbane-airport-20090626-czjx.html">today</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
A data processing unit fault at Brisbane Airport had triggered an alert, with all flights in and out of Brisbane halted as a result.</p>
<p>Incoming flights from places such as Fiji and Coffs Harbour were diverted to Coolangatta Airport or put in a holding pattern over Brisbane for almost 40 minutes.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The problem has since been fixed and regular traffic control restored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/26/brisbane-airport-shut-down-due-to-radar-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MIT Technology Review&#8217;s 2002 article on 10 Technology Disasters</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/22/mit-technology-reviews-2002-article-on-10-technology-disasters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/22/mit-technology-reviews-2002-article-on-10-technology-disasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Threatening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lives lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyfailure.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MIT Technology Review published an article 10 Technology Disasters back in 2002:

What do a 17th-century Swedish warship, an opulent Chicago theater and a Kansas City hotel &#8220;skyway&#8221; have in common? All met catastrophic ends&#8211;and they have important lessons to teach today&#8217;s innovators.

Here is a list of the examined examples, along with reference links to Wikipedia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/">MIT Technology Review</a> published an article <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/communications/12857/page1/">10 Technology Disasters</a> back in 2002:</p>
<blockquote><p>
What do a 17th-century Swedish warship, an opulent Chicago theater and a Kansas City hotel &#8220;skyway&#8221; have in common? All met catastrophic ends&#8211;and they have important lessons to teach today&#8217;s innovators.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is a list of the examined examples, along with reference links to Wikipedia (except for the AT&#038;T crash). </p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_(ship)">The Vasa sinking</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyatt_Regency_walkway_collapse">The Hyatt Regency walkway collapse</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iroquois_Theater_fire">The Iroquois Theater blaze</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eschede_train_disaster">The Eschede train derailment</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashtabula_River_Railroad_Disaster">The Ashtabula Creek Bridge wreck</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Francis_Dam">The St. Francis Dam burst</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Empress">The Atlantic Empress/Aegean Captain collision</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.phworld.org/history/attcrash.htm">The AT&#038;T network crash</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Blackout_of_1965">The 1965 Northeast blackout</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_4590">The Concorde crash</a></li>
</ul>
<p>We&#8217;ll take more in-depth looks at some of these and many other examples in future posts and articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/22/mit-technology-reviews-2002-article-on-10-technology-disasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taiwan High Speed Trains Delayed</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/21/taiwan-high-speed-trains-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/21/taiwan-high-speed-trains-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyfailure.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taiwan News reports that technical problems at Tainan station caused delays for high speed train traffic today. Problems at a railroad switch prompted ordering southbound trains to pass by the station without stopping.

The problem began at 12:10 Sunday noon, just three minutes before a train was scheduled to enter Tainan station. The driver was immediately [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=982710&#038;lang=eng_news&#038;cate_img=49.jpg&#038;cate_rss=news_Society_TAIWAN">Taiwan News reports</a> that technical problems at Tainan station caused delays for high speed train traffic today. Problems at a railroad switch prompted ordering southbound trains to pass by the station without stopping.</p>
<blockquote><p>
The problem began at 12:10 Sunday noon, just three minutes before a train was scheduled to enter Tainan station. The driver was immediately ordered not to stop, but to drive past the station first and then return.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to their ability to quickly modify a driver&#8217;s orders, delays were the only consequences here. There was another incident just this month, when high speed railroad traffic was disrupted by a faulty switch. Delays were more significant that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyfailure.com/2009/06/21/taiwan-high-speed-trains-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
